Gordon unsurprisingly, that was the ‘mixed team’ archery. You might immediately think muscle mass would be a factor and all other things being equal, it is - if your bow takes more strength to pull (technically ‘higher draw weight’) the arrow’s flight is flatter and quicker.
But the thing is - it doesn’t generally matter as long as you can get the arrow to the same point on the target consistently. A modern bow with say a 35lb draw weight will happily fling an arrow 70m (the standard range length) with only moderate ballistic drop, even if a 45lb draw one will have less.
So for archers at this level, as long as the flight of the arrow is consistent, you don’t need a bow with massive draw to hit the target every time, you just have to angle the shots up a bit more if your draw is a bit less. And the sights on the bows are there to do exactly that - compensate for the fall of the shot by telling the archer how much to tilt up the bow when they release the arrow. Every archer has their own ‘range guide’ which basically says ‘if you’re firing at a target 50m away, set the sight to tilt this much’ - you get that the obvious way, which archers somewhat presumptuously call ‘tuning’.
I mean, don’t get me wrong - I would struggle to pull the bow the Olympic women use for a full round of shots, because they shoot arrows for like 8 hours a day six days a week so even the ones that are like 5’ 2” have back muscles like titanium springs - but at this level it’s about consistency much more than power.
The one time draw weight really matters is in serious wind - in that case the flatter and faster the arrow travels the less time the wind has to move it off target. But elite level competitions don’t tend to happen if the wind is above ‘reasonable’, because past a certain point it just gets too random.